Rowing Technique
#1
Posted 09 August 2006 - 10:49 PM
Dona Nobis Pacem
#2
Posted 09 August 2006 - 11:08 PM
Because there is no official start/finish in the rowing movement, your best bet is to start sitting on the backstop (legs extended) with the handle drawn in to about your third rib up.
-You then extend your arms out, the drag in the chain should pull them out as well and with a straight back and straight, relaxed arms, start to stretch out (as if doing a hamstring type stretch) until your hands are past your knees. Getting this "length" off the backstop is vital to the rest of the stroke, as a long stoke is far more powerful.
- Holding the position of your back and arms (leaning forward, arms extended), slowly come up the slide, until you get to maximum length at the "catch" (start of the stroke). The movement from the backstop up the slide is your recovery time, so try not to rush back up the slide to take your next stroke.
- Now you are at the catch, pretty much do everything in reverse to how you came from the back. That is, drive your legs, then swing your back, then draw your arms in. your legs are the primary muscle group in the rowing stroke, try not to be too tense in the arms and just imagine hanging off the handle like you would from a tree - rather than gripping the handle, as this wastes energy in the arms and generally weakens your rowing stroke.
The aim is to incorporate the above into one, fluent movement. But the golden rule in rowing is the power comes from the legs. Try to accelerate the legs, that is imagine a force curve going from zero effort to 100 percent through the stroke. So as you first drive your legs, try to squeeze off the front of the slide, and then build the power in your legs from then, til you are at full acceleration at the back of the slide.
Hope this helps
#3
Posted 09 August 2006 - 11:17 PM
I row with my thumbs on top of the handle rather than below. Is that right or wrong?
Dona Nobis Pacem
#4
Posted 09 August 2006 - 11:28 PM
Another thing to try to check you are driving with your legs is to get someone to stand at the front end of the rowing machine (over the fan) and when you come out to full stretch at the catch, stop and let them hold the handle in between your hand grip. Then get them to hold it there while you start a stroke. If you are driving with your legs, your ass should lift off the seat, if you are pulling with your arms, you will pull them back over the fan!
#5
Posted 10 August 2006 - 09:23 AM
In saying that, when I did that 500 the other day, last 200 would hvae been a treat to see on how not to row I expect!!
my grip, on thumb under, one thumb over usually, just more comfortable that way - think a few thumb sprains / dislocations have caused that!!
is good to watch at the gym other rowers too, and you can soon pick up correct technique etc.
#6
Posted 11 August 2006 - 02:26 AM
#7
Posted 11 August 2006 - 02:34 AM
More resistance on ten but not always best to use. Like trying to ride a bike up a hill in the highest gear... you won't go very quick at all.
Dona Nobis Pacem
#8
Posted 11 August 2006 - 09:41 AM
#9
Posted 11 August 2006 - 11:17 AM
On the older concept two machines, it is generally between 4 and 5 on the resistence level. Less than this will make it harder to get your splits down and more than this will make it easier to get splits down, but of course the resistance is more as well.
Its all up to the individual in the end
#10
Posted 15 August 2006 - 04:10 AM
Dodge said:
I basically row on 10 if I'm trying to get a very very fast time - usually 5k or 2k, (anything after 5k & I'm pretty much physically screwed if I'm doing it on 10) but on 4 or 5 if I'm just doing my usual work out which is 40-50 minutes with my heart rate around 135 (I use a polar), this generally translates to starting at about 2.05/500 & gradually slowing to 2.15/500 by the end to keep the heart rate level all the way.
A lot depends on what you are trying to do, I always struggle to keep my heart rate down when I'm rowing on 10, also I've never seen the point in rowing at 10 then doing arm weights after as after even 10 minutes at 10 my arms are starting to feel pretty sore, so then I end up doing a lame arm workout, but I would have thought going at 10 for 20 minutes would be a pretty good substitute for an arms workout if you don't have time & want both.
Did read somewhere that when top rowers compete over 2000m they set it at only 4 or so.. I suppose this would make sense if you are 6 foot 5 (as most of them are) as you want a lot of strokes using your full height. On the flip side the average prop is short but with a lot of explosive leg power so you want minimum strokes but putting the full strength into each one. So the answer would be "depends on your height & build". If you are 6'5 row at 5 & aim for 40 strokes a minute, if you are 5'5 & built like a barrel row at 10 & aim for 25 a minute..
As Warlord says 4 or 5 equate to water drag too so I suppose all the top guys train at this level day in day out as it replicates the real thing, thats possibly more the reason than any complicated power to height deal.
However you do it its always a trade off between the number of strokes you can do per minute (- your cardio capacity) and the power you can put into each stroke (- your strength)
#11
Posted 25 August 2006 - 09:50 AM
#12
Posted 07 September 2006 - 05:27 AM
WillieTheWaiter said:
Yes, thinking about it after I wrote it I thought "um, I think thats backwards"
#13
Posted 07 September 2006 - 12:43 PM
WillieTheWaiter said:
Its not so much that shorter people 'aim' for a higher stroke rate when rowing hard on the machine, its more that taller people struggle to achieve and hold the stroke rate, as you say, because they have further to travel on the slide as well as a longer back swing and arm draw.
Im about 2 metres tall and if im going flat tack on the rowing machine I generally aim to hold it about 26-28 strokes per minute, anything higher than that is just rushed. Whereas guys who are under between 1.7-1.9 metres can get up around 32 strokes per minute with relative ease
#14
Posted 07 September 2006 - 03:46 PM
#15
Posted 07 September 2006 - 10:14 PM
BartMan said:
Yeah, I'm short arse - 5'7, & basically vary between 32-34, find to impossible to go under 28 without the pause thing which just seem's stupid as for it to workl well I need to just flow along
#16
Posted 07 September 2006 - 11:41 PM
Never rowed in my life and been on the machine a few times in the gym. Always found it a top workout but probably doing all sorts of damgae to my back by poor technique.
At the grand age of (almost) 37 I'm thinking of learning a new sport and rowing or kayaking are the two options Im leaning towards. But my lower back issues and bloody ITB effecting my knees may mean that Lawn Bowls may become the new hobby rather than on the water!
Thanks again for the tips - I wont post my times for a while though in the fear of embarassment next to you guys
#17
Posted 08 September 2006 - 12:07 AM
lightbulb said:
Never rowed in my life and been on the machine a few times in the gym. Always found it a top workout but probably doing all sorts of damgae to my back by poor technique.
At the grand age of (almost) 37 I'm thinking of learning a new sport and rowing or kayaking are the two options Im leaning towards. But my lower back issues and bloody ITB effecting my knees may mean that Lawn Bowls may become the new hobby rather than on the water!
Thanks again for the tips - I wont post my times for a while though in the fear of embarassment next to you guys
Hasn't stopped me
#18
Posted 08 September 2006 - 10:01 AM
Kirwan said:
lightbulb said:
Never rowed in my life and been on the machine a few times in the gym. Always found it a top workout but probably doing all sorts of damgae to my back by poor technique.
At the grand age of (almost) 37 I'm thinking of learning a new sport and rowing or kayaking are the two options Im leaning towards. But my lower back issues and bloody ITB effecting my knees may mean that Lawn Bowls may become the new hobby rather than on the water!
Thanks again for the tips - I wont post my times for a while though in the fear of embarassment next to you guys
Hasn't stopped me
OK - I will - but just to make you guys feel like you're Rob Waddell or Mahe Drysdale !!
#19
Posted 14 September 2006 - 09:57 PM
It will take a while to adjust to this new technique.
One thing I noticed though was my reps went from 27-28 down to 21-23 but my time/500 dropped about 6 seconds per 500, so he has obviously changed me for the good
Dona Nobis Pacem
#20
Posted 15 September 2006 - 08:30 AM
#21
Posted 15 September 2006 - 01:03 PM
Hooroo said:
It will take a while to adjust to this new technique.
One thing I noticed though was my reps went from 27-28 down to 21-23 but my time/500 dropped about 6 seconds per 500, so he has obviously changed me for the good
BartMan said:
I don't seem to be able to get the drive off though - and although I am no powerlifter, I would not think my thighs and calves are that weak...Might start doing some more squats to build up the strength in my legs and may help with this..
Technical question - how tight do you strap your feet in ? Should they be moving around a little / lot? When trying to focus on my leg drive it seems I am pushing more off the top of my feet but then I strap my feet in tighter and my knee is taking a bit of the strain (I think I f'd it yesterday trying to get my power up).
#22
Posted 15 September 2006 - 01:53 PM
One thing though, if your rower is moving about when you row, your technique is all up the shit!!
#23
Posted 15 September 2006 - 03:43 PM
As for leg drive, think of accelerating your legs through the stroke, i think i wrote something about it earlier in this thread but try and squeeze of at the front and really drive your legs down towards the end of the slide
#24
Posted 15 September 2006 - 04:12 PM
BartMan said:
One thing though, if your rower is moving about when you row, your technique is all up the shit!!
aucklandwarlord said:
As for leg drive, think of accelerating your legs through the stroke, i think i wrote something about it earlier in this thread but try and squeeze of at the front and really drive your legs down towards the end of the slide
Cheers guys - will work on it... Have not noticed the rower move around - but does not mean that my technique is not up the shit...
#25
Posted 29 September 2006 - 10:55 AM
#26
Posted 05 October 2006 - 04:00 AM
http://www.concept2.co.uk/training/tech ... hp?stage=1
Going to try it tonight and see what difference it makes. Spotted three or four things I'm doing wrong (pulling it up to high with bent wrists, leaning to far back, and moving too far down so my shins go past the verticle). According to the instructions I'm wasting a lot of energy.
#27
Posted 05 October 2006 - 04:13 AM
#28
Posted 05 October 2006 - 04:14 AM
MajorRage said:
Yeah, just read that this afternoon at "work". Having another crack at my 5km tonight.
#29
Posted 21 December 2006 - 10:48 AM
Anyway, my club held the 'RowPerfect' challenge a month ago - a time trial over 2k & 1k. Each year they invite the Waratahs (although the Junior squad only come down) to see what times they can post.
The best time, and what they believe is a world record on these typs of Erg was a bloke from Sydney Rowing Club who punched out 5min 44 secs !!!!
The best female did a 6:24 - and she is only 17. I have seen her on water form - she is brilliant.
Of the Waratahs (over 1500m) - Tim Davidson pulled 4:22 and Ben Hand 4:33.
That is all...
#30 Guest__*
Posted 05 January 2007 - 03:00 AM
Wondering if anyone has uses the "build the engine" approach with rowing...... got a model E for Christmas and starting to get into it.
Given up mountain biking for now as it misearable out and nearly got flattened by a madman in a beat up pickup who seems to think that cyclists don't have right of way! (What he told me after I shook my fist at him and he pulled over to ask me if I "wanted a piece" of him.)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










