30min Distances
#1
Posted 15 May 2007 - 01:51 AM
#2
Posted 06 June 2007 - 06:24 AM
#3
Posted 21 June 2007 - 05:31 AM
The first PB I have set for a couple of months!
Getting under a 2min split over 30mins, seems physically possible now.
Although I wish some slower people would post in this thread.. 7435 doesn't look so great next to Barts time
Kirwan got his rower a week ago and still hasn't posted a time... hmm
#4
Posted 21 June 2007 - 05:35 AM
I'll post my shithouse times soon enough.
#5
Posted 27 June 2007 - 11:30 PM
Much better rowing at home.
#6
Posted 19 July 2007 - 06:50 AM
In. Much. Pain.
#7
Posted 19 July 2007 - 08:59 AM
#8
Posted 19 July 2007 - 09:46 AM
#9
Posted 19 July 2007 - 09:52 AM
#10
Posted 19 July 2007 - 09:55 AM
Hard to stop rowing faster when the action is flowing though
#11
Posted 28 July 2007 - 07:10 PM
#12
Posted 04 August 2007 - 08:50 AM
Improved the amount of time at 2:05ish, and I think I did my best 5km on the way through on this one but I wasn't paying enough attention.
Great thing to have in the house, have put on a decent amount of muscle from it too, mostly on my back and thighs.
#13
Posted 07 August 2007 - 05:55 AM
Kirwan said:
I get that, I'll not row 2km or 5km for months & just do 30m or 10km then go all out to do a 5km & knock a shedload off my PB.
#14
Posted 07 August 2007 - 06:27 AM
#15
Posted 14 August 2007 - 12:05 AM
#16
Posted 14 August 2007 - 12:09 AM
What distance did you cover when you do this?
Do you normally have a huge drop off in pace when you set your best times?
I know I try to go faster at the beggining and hold on, but if you read the concept2 forums most people go for a negative split and get faster when they go for a PB.
I not sure that I could ever get my pacing that accurrate.
#17
Posted 14 August 2007 - 03:29 AM
Duluth said:
What distance did you cover when you do this?
Do you normally have a huge drop off in pace when you set your best times?
First 1km I do at 1.45 - 1.50. So then I'm technically 20-30 seconds "up" - ie if 2.00 per 500 is what I'm aiming for at 30 minutes then doing 1000m in 3.30-3.40 minutes means I'm 20 or 30 seconds up.
Then I just try keep it under 2.00 to the 10 minute mark. Usually end up doing 2500m in about 9.25-9.30. Then really just try crawl on to whatever distance I'm going.
I've tried doing a steady 1.59 all the way & that never works for me, only way I ever do a decent time is by really creaming the first 5 minutes. The sub 40m 10kms or the sub 30m 7.5kms are always down to being able to cruise along at 2.00 for the second 10 minutes so still being 30 seconds up at the 20 minute mark. Then you can afford a 2.05 minute km to rest.
The new displays on the concept 2's really show it well, if you set it to do 500m splits my good times always go -
1.52
1.53
1.57
1.57
1.58 (2.5km)
2.01
2.02
2.03
2.01
1.59 (5km)
2.08
2.08
2.07
2.06
1.58 (7.5km)
More or less
everyone will be different, personally I'm short so I struggle to do really fast splits but I'm pretty fit so I can sprint then still have enough left to coast along & occasionally drop another sprint in. I can see how if you are 6 foot+ then you can probably cruise along at 1.55 only doing 25 strokes a minute, to get down that low I need to be doing at least 31 or 32 & I just can't physically do that for longer that 5 or 6 minutes & still breathe. But I can do it for 5 minutes, then rest (do a 2.00-2.05) for 15 minutes then do another 1.55 for 2 or 3 minutes, then rest again & so on.
#18
Posted 14 August 2007 - 10:16 AM
I have set some PB times by doing intervals - rowing 6 or 8 strokes as hard and as strong as I can every minute, than 'cruising' through to the next minute mark, and digging in again for 6-8 strokes. your cruise still ends up pretty quick as you wind dwon from those hard strokes.
usually though set out at the low 1:50s, and then try and nudge the average time down the whole way, always doing the maths to see what I need to row to get a PB.
Make sure you have the correct PB time to aim for. I have timed a row to perfection in the past, only to have beaten an old PB, not the new one, and I still had fuel in the tank!!! Very annoying after 10k, that is for sure!!
#19
Posted 20 February 2008 - 05:53 AM
First time I've attempted this for a long time.. think I can add more distance to that fairly easily
#20
Posted 20 February 2008 - 01:22 PM
#21
Posted 03 April 2008 - 06:09 AM
7574m (PB)
Purely by accident my splits look quite similar to what Mogwai described a couple of posts up
1st 10min @ 1.55
2nd 10min @ 2.01
3rd 10min @ 2.00 (helped by the sprint at the end)
Overall a 1.59 split
The difficult part is judging how hard to push it early so that I can still hang on for a good time. I think I can go slighlty faster early or hold my faster pace for a bit longer..
Will try and give Mogwai's distance a nudge next time. Bart's record is still some way off :shocked:
#22
Posted 05 June 2008 - 03:51 PM
Meaning that you would target 2:00 to start with, and get faster as you go.
I do it quite well, but was doing it by accident before I learned that it was the way to go.
The way I used to get the negatives is have the average 500 on display, and every time it drops, don't let it go back up - so if you are cruising at 1:59.4, and it drops to 1:59.3, you keep it there. Eventually it will drop again, and you keep it at the new mark.
Makes you row at a constant speed, whcih must be good too...
So I reckon have a crack at 2:00 to start Duluth, and every time it drops, keep it there...
I got a PB over 30 minutes today 8396 not by negative splitting though!!
Every 500 metres, any 'spare seconds' I sprint like hell. So if I hit a 500 metre mark (say the first 500) at 1:50, I then sprint as hard as I can until the 2 minutes shoes up. Next 500 (teh 100 mark) may be at 3:39, so I will sprint for 21 seconds and so on. WEhen I have gained the whole minute, the sprints will shorten again, and then build up. just row at a good clip in between.
You might even land a PB doing that!!
#23
Posted 05 June 2008 - 08:51 PM
BartMan said:
Earlier this week I did a 10k @ 40:50 with moderate effort
Using negative splits and a similar amount of effort that dropped to 41:30
To do it properly I think you need three things:
- your technique must be good (you can't afford to have wasted energy from an inefficient stroke)
- you need to be disciplined
- you need to have a good understanding of what splits you should be hitting (I think this is that main reason I had such a drop off in the two 10ks this week)
I think I fail on all three counts
For the moment to hit a PB I think I need to keep using the Mogwai technique of going out fast and hanging on for dear life! Ultimately I want to get good at negative splits but it will take some time
#24
Posted 06 June 2008 - 10:08 AM
Just some of the million mind games that you play when you row, as most rowers would know - anything to fool the mind and keep it thinking about anything but the pain and how slow the metres are dropping off or adding up!!!
#25
Posted 20 June 2008 - 05:43 AM
7635m a new PB!
#26
Posted 20 June 2008 - 09:17 AM
#27
Posted 10 July 2008 - 01:06 AM
Duluth and Barts 7500+ seems wholly unreachable right now.
very enjoyable exercise and you definitely feel it as opposed to using a cross trainer!
#28
Posted 10 July 2008 - 02:01 AM
da_grubster said:
Duluth and Barts 7500+ seems wholly unreachable right now.
very enjoyable exercise and you definitely feel it as opposed to using a cross trainer!
When are you going to have a crack at another 30mins? If you have another attempt within a few days you'll have a good chance of going considerably faster (and knocking off Kirwan's time)
Actually I notice Kirwan hasn't posted a time for ages.. very strange for someone who spent all that money on buying their own concept2 :nta
#29
Posted 10 July 2008 - 09:46 AM
Going to run along the beach next week and see which part of my body falls off.
#30
Posted 10 July 2008 - 11:05 AM
Kirwan said:
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users









