Jump to content


- - - - -

Quick throw-ins


10 replies to this topic

#1 G-Man

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,785 posts

Posted 30 March 2009 - 04:42 PM

Ok, need to clear something up. A quick throw-in. You can only do a quick throw-in when:
    A. The lineout hasn't been formed yet.
    B. The ball hasn't been touched by someone else.

These rules hasn't changed with the hybrid ELV's?

If so, who is someone in B? Is it from the linesman to the ballboy, to the spectator, to the opposing team, or your own team. I want to find out specifically about the linesman. If he touch the ball can you still throw a quick throw-in?
Rhodes poorly executed a legal technique - Piutau perfectly executed an illegal technique.

#2 Godder

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,286 posts

Posted 30 March 2009 - 11:25 PM

If the linesman/ballboy touches the ball, no quick throw-ins are allowed.
It's still Lancaster Park to me.

#3 G-Man

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,785 posts

Posted 30 March 2009 - 11:34 PM

Thanx Godder, just wanted to make sure.
Rhodes poorly executed a legal technique - Piutau perfectly executed an illegal technique.

#4 Thomond78

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 8,632 posts

Posted 01 April 2009 - 11:25 PM

Question related to this occurred to me; the ball goes into touch outside your 22.

You get the ball; run back so that you are on the goal-line side of your 22, albeit still in touch; then throw it in to your kicker who then kicks it straight out.

Now, you haven't brought it back over the 22, as you were outside the field of play and the ball was dead at the time. You are allowed take the throw-in from wherever you want. Is it subject to the 22 ELV, or is touch where it goes into touch?
"What are you doing in my car?!"
"I"m the Bishop of Southwark. It's what I do..."

Back to shtick-fiytin we go! WOULDYALETITOUTTAFUCK! Pull hard into your man, hard, hard, hard, he's no relation, let every blow be a funeral!

Timmy Ryan - a Lijind for our times...

#5 sthvh

    Member

  • Members
  • 701 posts

Posted 07 April 2009 - 10:27 AM

Interesting question. I would suspect that since the ball was out of play, it would not be "played back" and you would have the line out where it went out of bounds on the return kick. Could not find a reference to it though.

Also interesting is:

Quote

For a quick throw in, the player must use the ball that went into
touch. If, after it went to touch and was made dead, another ball
is used, or if another person has touched the ball apart from the
player throwing it in
, then the quick throw in is disallowed. The
same team throws in at the lineout.

"I've spent most of my money on beer and women.  The rest I wasted."

#6 Cumbrian

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 121 posts

Posted 20 April 2009 - 11:02 PM

Thomond78 said:

Question related to this occurred to me; the ball goes into touch outside your 22.

You get the ball; run back so that you are on the goal-line side of your 22, albeit still in touch; then throw it in to your kicker who then kicks it straight out.

Now, you haven't brought it back over the 22, as you were outside the field of play and the ball was dead at the time. You are allowed take the throw-in from wherever you want. Is it subject to the 22 ELV, or is touch where it goes into touch?

This exact question was asked of the IRB a few weeks ago - in the hope that they give us clarification of the law. We, as refs in the South East part of London, then got the bit of literature in which the IRB stipulated that you have taken the ball back into your 22 in this situation, so if the kick went dead you'd come back for the line out in the 22.

#7 G-Man

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,785 posts

Posted 20 April 2009 - 11:11 PM

Cumbrian said:

Thomond78 said:

Question related to this occurred to me; the ball goes into touch outside your 22.

You get the ball; run back so that you are on the goal-line side of your 22, albeit still in touch; then throw it in to your kicker who then kicks it straight out.

Now, you haven't brought it back over the 22, as you were outside the field of play and the ball was dead at the time. You are allowed take the throw-in from wherever you want. Is it subject to the 22 ELV, or is touch where it goes into touch?

This exact question was asked of the IRB a few weeks ago - in the hope that they give us clarification of the law. We, as refs in the South East part of London, then got the bit of literature in which the IRB stipulated that you have taken the ball back into your 22 in this situation, so if the kick went dead you'd come back for the line out in the 22.

So then it is considered taken back if the ball goes out before the 22 and you go back in to your 22 in the outside of the playing area?
Rhodes poorly executed a legal technique - Piutau perfectly executed an illegal technique.

#8 Goober

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,039 posts

Posted 03 May 2009 - 06:37 PM

What the IRB have said is that, for the purposes of the new 'carried back' law, the 22 m line extends beyond the field of play. So it depends where the thrower gets hold of the ball, even if he is over the touchline.

If he touches it in front of the 22, even if out of play, then he runs back and throws it in behind the 22, it's carried back.

If he first gets hold of it behind the 22 m line, and throws it in behind the 22 m line, then it's not carried back, even if it WENT out in front of the 22 m line.

Something else interesting that is coming out of this is that set-pieces taking place on the 22m line will create a lot of confusion. So instead of conveniently using the line as the mark for a lineout or scrum, refs are tending to move the mark one way or the other to avoid confusion as to whether the defending team has 'carried it back' if they win the ball.

Rucks and mauls that get pushed back and forth over the 22 m line are also pretty tricky; not so much in terms of the law, but in terms of trying to figure out who carried it back etc. Edit: this last point covered in the other thread.
Vote for Mils you fools

#9 Tordah

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,279 posts

Posted 14 September 2011 - 07:10 PM

I've got a question regarding offside at quick throws.

kicker from team A punts the ball deep into opposition territory, there's several team A lazy forwards way in front of him, slowly turning around, going a meter back or so. The ball goes out, team B wants to take a quick throw. Can team A forwards stay there to prevent the quick throw, even if no kick chaser from team A put them onside?
So question is: is the offside rule concerning being in front of the kicker and chasers gone as soon as the ball passes the touchline?
I've seen that dozens of times, so I figured as much, but I think that's a bit weird.

Thanks

#10 Voltron

    $26M Lotto Winner

  • Members
  • 1,817 posts

Posted 14 September 2011 - 09:51 PM

I vaguely recall a clarification on this a while back, gist being that if the ball is out of play there is no offside line, therefore once the ball crosses the touchline all players are onside for the purpose of a quick throw.
A weak man is not as happy as the same man would be if he were strong. This reality is offensive to some people who would like the intellectual or spiritual to take precedence. It is instructive to see what happens to these very people as their squat strength goes up.

Mark Rippetoe - Starting Strength

#11 Damo

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 141 posts

Posted 16 September 2011 - 06:47 PM

Tordah said:

I've got a question regarding offside at quick throws.

kicker from team A punts the ball deep into opposition territory, there's several team A lazy forwards way in front of him, slowly turning around, going a meter back or so. The ball goes out, team B wants to take a quick throw. Can team A forwards stay there to prevent the quick throw, even if no kick chaser from team A put them onside?
So question is: is the offside rule concerning being in front of the kicker and chasers gone as soon as the ball passes the touchline?


Thanks

Yes. Them's the breaks I'm afraid. Once it goes out they are automatically put onside.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

           
  •                          
  •                    
  •            View New Content